Corporate, Legal

Is 2:1 The New 1:1?

In Rieger v. Giant Eagle, Inc., the Ohio Court of Appeals (Eighth District) reversed a trial court’s decision declaring Ohio’s 2:1 cap on punitive damages unconstitutional as applied in that case

By Andrew Frey & Evan Tager |Mayer Brown - Punitive Damages Blog on August 03, 2018 at 3:00 PM

Topics: Arbino v. Johnson & Johnson, Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker, JDSupra, Ohio Court of Appeals, Rieger v. Giant Eagle, SCOTUS, State Farm